Disposable cameras are a whole art to themselves. Simple mechanics, solid performance (flash/shutter action), and 35mm 100/400iso film- it's hard to mess up a shot if you know what you're doing. But who ever knows what they're doing? Experimentation with grainy results and no worries about gear getting messed up.
(domes are super safe working environments for cameras)
But they're fun for beginners too. The satisfaction of clicking away ten pictures of the SAME DAMN THING (AMEEEEEEEENNNNN!! hahahaha) is undeniable. Once we see the results we quickly realize all the mistakes and that is life, you did or didn't get the shot, the world is over (or at least coming to an end)..
(That shot got caught not parking Charles)
But really: the more photos you take the better your eye gets as it recognizes what makes a nice picture so nice!
If I were to teach a photography class I would start out with some disposable cameras. The course fees would go towards four of the five dollar cameras (equipped with a flash), processing fees, and prints (maybe even doubles so they could trade pics amongst themselves).
(Sharing is caring: Elisa and Ali know best!!)
The first week we would talk about composition, color, contrast, aesthetics: things that make a picture beautiful. What makes one picture more likable than another?
The second week would be about light: aperture, shutter speed, flashes, and the mechanics of a camera. How different cameras record images, film formats, etc.
The third week would be about editing. Students would choose favorite photos of theirs, their classmates, and pros and explain what they liked about them. How we choose which photos to post/print/delete, costs of photography, advertising etc.
The fourth week would be a full on show with students presenting their favorite 12 shots.
After the first week students would display one roll each. Just shots from that week. And in whatever order they were taken.
The second week would be the same only they could choose to display from both rolls.
Third week presentations would be comparing own works with others.
Fourth week show. Peer review of 12 top shots (including descriptions of why chosen)
(rule of fourths? haha)
The whole idea behind this would be to hone the eye. A good photo is not a photo because you pressed the shutter. It is because you have taken the time to compose the situation and translate it into the lens. You have taken all the variables into consideration and not wasted your shot as a car went by, but rather waited until the ENTIRE universe was ready for that shot to happen. By forcing students to pay for their rolls hopefully they'd develop a sense of why certain photos are considered "good" or "bad" and therefore be challenged to take better pictures. A week is the perfect amount of time to take 24 pictures. Why not, right?
Disposable rolls are for me a good time to experiment. Portraits (which I am not too fond of) are made easier for some reason with the handy disposable. The cameras themselves don't get in the way and I have no worries about it getting smashed by some skateboard or dropped in the water, whatever.
I'll stop talking now. Here are some of my favorites I took over the past two months touring through Western Canada with the goof troop..
Charles sprays the lip as a BC grom looks on.
"Am I really gonna be that hairy someday?" he thinks...
Vancouver, BC.
Lights and timing and a nice night.
Jasper, AB
Furry balls and fire
Canadian road trip shot
And a token "sunset on the beach" shot for good measure!!
Now get outside and take some pictures people!!
Sean